The Post-Gazette just published an article, confirming the rumor that 3 District Justice seats maybe elminated this year. 1 of those seats is Nathan Firestone who is retiring at the end of this year.
But Doug Sheild’s website has a new url – Shieldsforjudge.com the same site is also at ShieldsforPittsburgh.com
The Joe Hoeffel campaign announced today that they are joining Onorato and Williams on TV.
Here’s the ad:
It has taken a while for this race to really start getting wide attention. With plenty of undecided voters still out there, the compressed timeline may serve to level the playing field. If the other candidates are able to afford TV in these final weeks up until the election, then Onorato has essentially lost his fundraising advantage. With all 4 candidates expected to be on TV this week, the volatile race may be settled by the campaign that is better able to put together a strong field campaign and who can run the best Election Day program.
Anthony Williams launched an ad challenging Dan Onorato‘s record on change. The Onorato campaign has used this ad in 2 different fund raising emails this week. The polls released today show Onorato way ahead of the other candidates in the race. If Onorato is so far ahead of the other candidates why is he sending out multiple emails about the ad from the Williams campaign and drawing more attention to the ads from Williams. What do you think?
Here is the ad from the Williams campaign (h/t to PA2010.com – it took us a while to find this ad on youtube)
The onorato campaign has sent fundraising emails on Monday May 2 and Tuesday May 3 – asking for contributions to help to grow support for Onorato.
Here is the email from today:
Dear Friends,
With the May 18th primary two weeks away, two new polls show that our campaign is building even more momentum and Dan Onorato is establishing big leads over his competitors.
These results prove that Dan’s message of economic growth and government reform is resonating with Pennsylvanians. His opponents, on the other hand, are not connecting with voters and are failing to gain any traction.
As a result, they are becoming desperate.
Tony Williams released a new attack ad yesterday that attempts to mislead voters on Dan’s record and accomplishments in Allegheny County.
Williams’ ad is so misleading and dishonest that it really shouldn’t merit a response. Unfortunately, we cannot allow these false attacks to go unanswered.
We need your help to fight back and continue telling Pennsylvania voters the truth about Dan Onorato. With only days left before Election Day, it is now more important than ever that we ensure our message is reaching everywhere in the state.
The truth is that Dan has been a strong and effective County Executive.
His county’s unemployment rate is below the state’s and the nation’s, and he has helped drive Pittsburgh’s turnaround over the last few years – a fact highlighted yesterday by Forbes Magazine’s designation of Pittsburgh as “America’s Most Livable City,” because of its low unemployment, high income growth and low crime rate.
We definitely have the momentum. In the Muhlenberg/Morning Call daily tracking poll, Onorato earns 36%, Joe Hoeffel and Tony Williams each earn 9% and Jack Wagner earns 8%.
A Quinnipiac University poll shows Onorato at 36% and Hoeffel at 9%, with Williams and Wagner each at 8%.
And I know that with your continued help, we can send Dan to Harrisburg to create the kind of real change Pennsylvania needs.
Click here to make a contribution so we can fight back against the false attacks.
If you have been folowing some of the reactions to the snow in Pittsburgh – Luke Ravenstahl’s name is mentioned in response to the snow clean up. But today there is another question being asked about the mayor – Where’s Luke?
It seems to have started with JanePitt around 11:30 this morning…
Despite rumors, no confirmation that Mayor left town. His city car has not been here yesterday or today - cancelled mtg with Pres. Harris
On 6:03 PM Feb 16th 2010from web
At 1:30 JanePitt tweets Luke was not at Murtha’s Funeral – create the hashtag #whereisluke
Via Facebook: Luke's campaign manager / brand new Government Affairs Manager Paul McKrell departed for New Orleans yesterday.
On 6:48 PM Feb 16th 2010from web
And its no surprise that PA still needs some major ethics reform. Yesterday’s Post-Gazette had a story about a Pittsburgh based lobbyist, Leslie Merrill McCombs, being fined by the State Ethics Commission for lobbying Ed Rendell for Lionsgate Films. (Film rep fined over lobbying of Rendell, Post-Gazette 9/9/09). That name sounded familiar – McCombs is also the Lady who hosts those strange UPMC minute commercials that we have to watch, and she used to be a court reporter for the TV show Judge Mathis. Her bio from the UPMC website:
Leslie Merrill McCombs is the senior consultant for Government Relations at UPMC. In her role, she provides strategic direction and positioning counsel in all aspects of government and public relations, as well as media. She’s also the host of UPMC Minute, and hosts the regional tourism show, Discover Pittsburgh 250, sponsored by UPMC Health Plan. She brings more than 18 years of television and news experience to her role. Before coming to UPMC, Leslie was the court reporter on Telepictures’ nationally syndicated court show, Judge Mathis, and was a news anchor in several television markets, including Pittsburgh’s FOX 53 News.
Also interesting – in 2007 – both McCombs and Rendell tried to diffuse this issue. McCombs said it was a “technical non-compliance.” See the 2007 WTAE story and Bob Mayo’s Blog post.
How did Hollywood qualify for the break? Lobbyists Leslie Merrill McCombs, a former Fox TV reporter in Pittsburgh, and Mike Veon, a once-powerful Democratic state representative from Beaver County, lobbied for it on behalf of Lionsgate, a leading independent film and TV production company based in Santa Monica, Calif.
Harris Mayoral Campaign Raises over $105,000 - Says fundraising total shows vast support for campaign
Mayoral candidate Franco “Dok” Harris today announced that he has raised over $105,000 from over 200 individuals to date. Harris is the only candidate who is employing campaign contribution limits, which are modeled after the Federal rules.
“I am greatly honored by the outpouring of support we are receiving,” Harris said. “With the strong financial backing – in spite of self-imposed contribution limits – and the vast number of people supporting our cause, we are building the momentum necessary for victory this November. ”
Harris said that the broad base of support is a sign that Pittsburghers want to depart from the politics of the past and are ready to forge ahead with new leadership.
“Pittsburghers want a mayor who represents them, not big campaign contributors,” Harris said. “They want a leader who will fight to reduce violent crime, and create a city which embraces small business. As your mayor, I will be committed to transparency and good government – our City deserves better than business as usual.”
The break is over – you have had 2 weeks to rest since the May primary election and it looks like the candidates are starting their engines for the race to the November elections. Kevin Acklin is holding a campaign kickoff evene t tomorrow at the Pittsburgh center for the arts. So we thought it was time to kick off the 2nd leg of the Race for Pgh with a new poll. Both Kevin Acklin and Dok Harris are challenging Luke Ravenstahl in the November 2009 election.
Who are you supporting for Allegheny County Controller
Democratic Mayoral Candidate and City Council Member Patrick Dowd Puts a Price Tag on Ravenstahl Administration’s Wasteful Government Spending
Following up on last week’s “Wake Up Call” to voters, Democratic Mayoral candidate Patrick Dowd will put a preliminary price tag on the administration’s waste and mismanagement. ”This is only the tip of the iceberg,” Dowd said. ”The taxpayers aren’t getting a return on their investment in this city. The current administration’s wasteful spending serves politicians and their cronies and not Pittsburghers.”
WHAT: DOWD PUTS A PRELIMINARY PRICE TAG ON WASTEFUL SPENDING, MERCHANT WALK FOLLOWED BY 11:15 AM PRESS CONFERENCE AT 11th and E. CARSON
Franco “Dok” Harris Running for Mayor of Pittsburgh
March 09, 2009 10:00am
Franco “Dok” Harris, 29, has announced his candidacy for Mayor of the City of Pittsburgh. A native Pittsburgher and graduate of the University of Pittsburgh School of Law and Carnegie Mellon‘s Tepper School of Business, Mr. Harris has set forth a bold platform to address the many challenges facing the city and is committed to revitalizing our local economy.
I am running to be the next Mayor of the City of Pittsburgh because our city faces complex and difficult issues and requires wise stewardship to address them successfully.
The Pittsburgh of today faces an upcoming budget crunch and a profound pension crisis which must be met and addressed proactively before they cripple our hometown and further burden our already weakened infrastructure. We are now witnessing the local effects of a national economic downturn. We see neighborhoods ravaged by structural unemployment and crime. We watch as young graduates leave Pittsburgh to pursue careers in other cities. The Pittsburgh of today requires strong leadership to help it grow into a city that honors both the dreams of our children as well as the sacrifices of those who have gone before us.
As your mayor, the Pittsburgh of tomorrow will be an economic powerhouse; a green city that is a friend to businesses both small and large. Our city will work for our workers by ensuring fair wages and fair treatment. The Pittsburgh of tomorrow will be the intersection of labor and technology, where both startups and large corporations will benefit from the hard working blue collar spirit of our community and the intellectual trust of our universities. As your mayor I commit to building Pittsburgh into that city upon a hill – or in this case, three rivers – as an example of the role that good government has in our common successful future. I ask you to join me on this journey. Together, we will Forge Ahead. (more…)
Yesterday Bram at the Pittsburgh Comet wrote a post about Twitter – so we decieded to see what else people were saying about local politics on twitter. A quick search and we learned about LukeForMayor.com.
The press release from Luke Ravenstahl’s office that was posted here yesterday caught my eye. I have been following the idea of LED street lights since I first read about New York City switching to LED street lights in the November 2008 issue of Wired Magazine.
Given the discussion this week around Luke’s decision to spend $250k on trash cans – any talk of spending from the mayor’s office seems to stick out more than usual.
But wait – there is more…
A couple of blog posts point out that Luke’s took too much credit for Bob O’connors Market Square ideas. the post What about Bob, from the PG’s Early Returns links to both Matt H and Chris Schultz’s posts on who really championed Market Square.
Do Luke and Yarone really not read the blogs? They are at it again with the LED lights. Why is there no mention of Peduto in this press release? After reading this post on the PG – it is really starting to look like Team Luke is getting defensive.
On December 15, 2008 the Post-Gazette ran this article – Peduto proposes LED street lights
The city should convert its 40,000 old-fashioned street-light bulbs to green-friendly LED lights, Councilman William Peduto announced today. The conversion would cost $24 million, but yearly cost savings of $2.7 million could be used to pay for the upgrade, as well as a state-funded energy program.
LED lights use less power than old bulbs and last years longer, which would account for the annual savings, according to Mr. Peduto’s office. He is urging the city to apply for funding through the state’s Guaranteed Energy Savings Agreement and issue a Request for Proposals from interested lighting companies to perform a six-month test run of the bulbs. The lights have already been tested along Walnut Street in Shadyside, which Mr. Peduto represents.
I received the following email from the Duquesne Democrats.
“…The second opportunity available is something *name* pointed out to me earlier this week and that is a few unpaid internships within the mayors office: “The campaign is looking for several hard-working, and self-motivated unpaid interns for this semester.
Though unpaid, they are willing to do it for credit, and according to *name*, “a kickass letter of reccomendation from the Mayor.”
Now, am I the only one who sees some technical errors? Such as HELP WITH THE CAMPAIGN and INTERN in the MAYOR’S OFFICE?
Ironically, those elements in the GOP want to run things more like Pa. Democrats.
Dem state committee endorsements are not binding despite requiring a higher, two-thirds threshold (the PAGOP only requires 50 percent plus 1). Democratic county committees can – and often do – endorse primary opponents of candidates that have been endorsed by the state committee.
And efforts by reformers who want the party to emulate the GOP – by tightening up the bylaws or to committing noteworthy financial resources to back up endorsements – are the subject of intense scrutiny by progressives and activists.
So who’s right? GOP party leaders point to the most important statistic of all: win rate. Since 2001, the GOP has won 54 percent of contested statewide elections.
Ironically, those elements in the GOP want to run things more like Pa. Democrats.
Dem state committee endorsements are not binding despite requiring a higher, two-thirds threshold (the PAGOP only requires 50 percent plus 1). Democratic county committees can – and often do – endorse primary opponents of candidates that have been endorsed by the state committee.
And efforts by reformers who want the party to emulate the GOP – by tightening up the bylaws or to committing noteworthy financial resources to back up endorsements – are the subject of intense scrutiny by progressives and activists.
So who’s right? GOP party leaders point to the most important statistic of all: win rate. Since 2001, the GOP has won 54 percent of contested statewide elections.
This blog is a forum to share information about community organizations, politics and other civic activities in Pittsburgh. Post and comments on this site do not necessarily represent the views of ProgressPittsburgh.org. The views expressed on this website - post and comments - are those of the authors alone. Visit the About page to learn more.
Follow Us!